Tag Archives: seas

Why Don’t We Think About the Oceans?

Image result for free pics of ocean devastation by war
courtesy freepic.com

Ezekiel 33:6: “But if the watchman sees the sword coming and does not blow the trumpet, and the people are not warned, and the sword comes and takes any person from among them, he is taken away in his iniquity; but his blood I will require at the watchman’s hand.” Let the reader understand this warning.

Revelation 16:3:  Then the second angel poured out his bowl on the sea, and it became blood as of a dead man; and every living creature in the sea died.

Consider the desolation of this imagery. Now consider the possibility that the destruction of the oceans might be man-made. Has everyone in this whole world completely lost their collective minds? If we’ve all been reduced to only being concerned with what the next revelation of the Epstein files or what is about to be revealed in the Erika Kirk/J.D. Vance affair, then we might well deserve the dismal fate that awaits us and indeed, that awaits mankind. Folkpotpourri has addressed this on more than one occasion, but with the scant readership this site gets, word of this is unlikely to get out from here, nevertheless, surprisingly few seem to be aware of these warnings of a looming disaster that is (currently) gathering off the coast of Venezuela and I’m not talking about some impending regime change or oil theft war that might happen and be over in short order. There doesn’t seem to be much concern about it anywhere else either. If this thing gets out of hand, think about the number of Fukushima and Chernobyl size disasters that might result on the floor of the Caribbean ocean. American ships that can be sunk by Chinese missiles with obliterated nuclear reactors strewn across miles and miles of Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico waters (spewing poisons) and thus shorelines to eradicate any possible life-sustaining fishing or other activities for the next several hundred – maybe thousands of – years.

If the world survives some conflict in the Caribbean, but even a few nuclear-powered vessels are sunk by modern Chinese missiles that have been developed by highly capable scientists and engineers (while American R&D folks are only busy trying to siphon money off the taxpayers instead of developing air defenses capable of challenging new Chinese technology), the completely surprised American defense establishment might suddenly find themselves losing assets to systems that can efficiently destroy American ships, how will our leaders undertake to contain the nuclear contamination damage that will inevitably result? Will they even recognize that such a catastrophe has occurred? The propaganda establishment will no doubt go into overdrive trying to minimize any publicity of such devastation, but that won’t bring back fish or whales.

Imagine vast tracts of Venezuelan beaches, lands adjacent to the sea, and fishing waters rendered unusable as poisons leach out of the wreckage of ship reactors (and weapons) decades from now. The actors who so thoughtlessly brought such devastation will no doubt be long gone, but if any hapless survivors would dare to try and make use of the coastlands once abundant with life and life-sustaining resources, they would soon find it suicidal to even go there. In the highly unlikely event that there might possibly be survivors in some future dystopian nightmare world, they would no doubt spend what might be left of their short lives wondering what “leaders” in the 21st century were thinking. Could they not see what might become the result of such an obvious threat? Where were the populations and why did they allow this? Why, they were too enthralled over Donald Trump insanity (on all sides) to worry about such mundane things as the careless destruction of our environment.

courtesy wallpaperacess.com

If the truth was known and wisely promulgated throughout society, naval battles are and have been rendered insanely reckless with the advent of nuclear-powered vessels. Nuclear power might be (somewhat) safely managed on civilian vessels like icebreakers and even container ships, but to send nuclear powered war vessels into battle is absolutely one of the most irresponsible decisions any Admiral or national leader could make. Any war in which several ships with nuclear reactors and weapons are sunk will result in irrecoverable harm to vast areas of the oceans – maybe the entirety of our oceans – and the life therein.

An even greater danger is that when this war goes hot and other superpowers get involved, there will be nuclear-powered vessels sunk in all the oceans of the earth, not just off Venezuela. If some of the ill-advised leaders who currently control the buttons of nuclear destruction get their way, if they continue to push a catastrophic war that goes nuclear, most of the lands of the earth will certainly be rendered toxic for many years, but the oceans and the food chains they provide and support will be contaminated with nuclear poisons, ensuring that the sea will not offer any relief in the way of foodstuffs if there are survivors.

Mankind has had opportunity to abandon our proclivity for wars on more than one occasion – such as at the end of previous world wars – and should have done so long ago. Everyone should read up on the Marine General Smedley Butler who finally concluded that all wars are fought at the behest of the rich man and they doubtlessly are. We’re not all rich men, so why don’t we unrich, who greatly outnumber the rich, join together and say no to their wars and devastation? There are other, infinitely more worthwhile pursuits we could undertake. For instance, we could all be trying to develop desalination technology to try and help sustain the populations of areas currently threatened by water shortages. Places like Iran and the US desert southwest are under extreme water shortage threat, and if a fraction of the financing currently directed to ensuring people can kill each other was instead turned to helping get water to people in need, the world might be able to overcome those water supply problems. There’s plenty of water in our oceans, so why not make the water usable instead of threatening to destroy it with radioactivity? After all, the same greedy corporations who currently build bombs and missiles could turn instead to making their fortunes on water technology. Since they won’t consider making their money helping people, and instead would rather invest in destruction, Satan must truly be in control. What are our leaders thinking?

Image result for free pics of sunken submarines
courtesy freepic.com

There are currently eight damaged nuclear-powered subs possibly already – but inevitably will start someday – releasing radiation on the ocean floor and who knows what the future portends just from these? For the sake of our oceans, we must do whatever we can to prevent any more. Any ideas?

Fukushima still pours nuclear radiation into Japanese waters with no end in sight. The US military has effectively destroyed once thriving islands in the Pacific with A Bomb tests. The careless Ukrainians keep launching missiles at the protective dome over the Chernobyl plant, and keep damaging it, so there doesn’t seem to be much concern for the future of humanity, just an unhinged desire to damage “the enemy”.

courtesy cultea.fr

Please spread this message as far as you can. Make your own posts if need be, but we need to get this concern out there. We all love our oceans and should make it a common concern to try to protect them – and the God-given creatures they sustain.

May the blessings of the Almighty Father find and keep us in our time of need.

MK